Nussknacker vs Apache NiFi

Low-Code streaming intelligence or Flow-Based data routing?

Nussknacker and Apache NiFi both handle data workflows but with different approaches. Their differences lie in architecture, ease of use, and real-time processing capabilities.
Pictures shows Apache NiFi vs Nussknacker

What is Apache NiFi?

Apache NiFi is an open-source data integration and automation tool designed for managing and routing data flows between systems. It offers a visual, flow-based interface that simplifies data ingestion, transformation, and distribution in real-time or batch processing. With its flexible architecture, NiFi supports various data formats, ensuring efficient, scalable, and secure data movement across enterprises.

Read more about Apache NiFi

Choose Your Event-Driven Architecture

Image shows Apache NiFi sample workflow

Apache NiFi base features

  • flow-based processing, drag-and-drop UI for designing, routing, and transforming data flows visually,
  • data ingestion & connectivity, supports multiple protocols (HTTP, FTP, Kafka, MQTT, JDBC) for real-time and batch data collection,
  • data provenance & tracking, full data lineage tracking with audit logs, replayability, and compliance support,
  • security & access control, role-based access, encryption, authentication (LDAP, Kerberos), and SSL/TLS support,
  • extensibility & customization, supports custom processors, scripting, NiFi Registry, and integration with external systems,
  • scalability & high availability, clustered mode with load balancing, backpressure handling.

Nussknacker core features

  • unifies data processing, supports streaming, batch & synchronous (HTTP) data processing,
  • powerful low-code platform, drag-and-drop interface for seamless data processing automation,
  • real-time stream processing, built on Apache Flink for high-throughput and low-latency data handling,
  • stateful computations, supports windowing, aggregations, and event correlation for complex stream analytics,
  • scalability & performance, leverages Flink's distributed architecture for horizontal scaling and fault tolerance,
  • integration & extensibility, connects with Kafka, databases, APIs, and allows custom Flink operators,
  • machine learning support, seamless ml model deployment & inference solution,
  • monitoring & observability, provides real-time metrics, debugging tools, and audit logs for tracking workflows.

Images shows Nussknacker Drag&Drop streaming process interafe

More reasons to choose proper solution

Although both tools might share multiple features and even strike with visual similarities, they have different fields of application. If data is a haystack, Apache NiFi moves it efficiently, while Nussknacker finds the needles - fraud, risks, top customers, and real-time insights.

 Apache NiFiNussknacker
Core purpose & target usersData movement and transformation, for Data Engineers, DevOpsReal-time actions on data, for Business analysts, Domain Experts
Validation & TypingMinimal type enforcement & basic validation, relying on user-defined settings and metadataStrong typing and validation, with built-in safeguards to catch errors early before deployment
Data processingStreaming, batch, synchronous (HTTP)Streaming & batch based on Apache Flink, synchronous (HTTP)
State managementLimited state management, mainly global state supportFull stateful support, including time windowing and aggregations
SecurityRisky, allows execution of system commandsLimited direct system access, preventing the execution of arbitrary commands
IsolationLimited isolation, as all processes share the same execution environmentProcesses are fully isolated, running in independent Flink jobs or K8s pods
PerformanceMedium-latency; optimized for reliable data movementHigh-throughput & low-latency event processing
ScalabilityScales horizontally but requires tuningScalability using Flink’s distributed processing or K8s
ExtensibilityCustom Java processors and scripting supportExposes Scala API for custom components, supports UDF's

Nussknacker or Apache NiFi? Making the right choice

Nussknacker is the best choice for real-time & low-latency processing, handling large data volumes with minimal delay. Designed for business users, it enables logic definition without deep technical expertise.

It supports stateful management, complex event processing, and seamless machine learning model inference in streaming workflows like fraud detection, marketing automation, and credit scoring.

Apache NiFi, on the other hand, is better suited for ETL and data movement tasks where low latency isn’t critical. It’s a powerful tool for technical users, especially those comfortable with coding and scripting (e.g., Python).

NiFi is particularly strong in data ingestion, transformation, and system integration, making it ideal for handling diverse data sources and routing data between systems.

In fact, many IT architectures may benefit from both products. For instance, Apache NiFi is a tool you would consider when preparing training sets for your ML workflows, and Nussknacker should be your choice when it comes to model inference in real-time scenarios. Similarly, you can use the former to fuel a data lake for analytics and the latter to employ the results in decision scenarios and business actions.

Next steps